GEIF
Greif, Inc., incorporated in 1926, is a producer of industrial packaging products and services with manufacturing facilities located in over 50 countries. The Company offers a line of industrial packaging products, such as steel, fiber and plastic drums, rigid intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, water bottles and reconditioned containers, and services such as container lifecycle management, blending, filling and other packaging services, logistics and warehousing. It is also a producer of flexible intermediate bulk containers and North American provider of industrial and consumer multiwall bag products. It also produces containerboard and corrugated products for niche markets in North America. It sells timber to third parties from its timberland in the southeastern United States. It has four segments: Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services, Flexible Products & Services, Paper Packaging and Land Management. It sells industrial packaging products to customers in industries, such as chemicals, paints and pigments, food and beverage, petroleum, industrial coatings, agricultural, pharmaceutical and mineral, among others.
While researching Geif, I found various articles about their industry. The first one was very well stated and simple. It described what their industry was about and even showed graphs to show the audiences their progress on the finances in the economy with other leading industries that are competing with GEIF.
- Do they prefer one social network to another? What makes you think that? Explain. Use evidence. It’s hard to tell because I found numerous amounts of website pertaining to GEIF, and all of them presented itself in a different manner. For example the one I first visited was very simple to understand and only had some graphs, while others were more detailed and showed videos and pictures to make their website more appealing.
- If two or more of the organizations/individuals both use Facebook or Twitter, compare how the way they use the tools in similar or unique ways. For instance, how consistently do they most status updates, what types of images do they use for profile pictures, what types of writing is found on the different social media platforms, how robust or developed is their presence. Describe how you see these folk using these tools, in other words.
By comparing the two GEIF websites they both composed them very differently. The first one was very plain with just regular print, and same font for everything. The only time they used colors was for the graphs. It was also really easy to find exactly you were looking for, which is why I choose this one rather than the other one. The second online website for GEIF was more colorful, used different size and color fonts and everything was spread out on the website.
What is the aims/purposes that the organizations are using specific posts for? Try to account for the different ways that aims fit into larger scale goals and desires. For instance, if I’m an environmental group at URI I might hope to end global warming at a large scope. At a more mid-level scope, my goal might be to increase awareness about the importance of members of the URI community recycling responsibly. But I might retweet a post about an event the SEC is holding where they will show a documentary. My aim, in this case, is most simply to get members of the URI community to attend the showing of this documentary, or to make community members aware that such an event exists. By observing what GEIF’s intention is for us consumers, they explained in depth what their goals were in to succeeding, and by doing this they have sites on their website were you can look at the projects they have accomplished as well as what they are currently doing now. By doing this, the readers have an indication of how reliable and credible they really are.
- Who are the audiences the groups/individuals target? Think about this the same way you thought about aims. Thing about audiences generally, and try to move to a more specific and narrow description of the people who might care. If I am analyzing the URI Sustainable Seafood Initiative, for instance, I might think that citizens from Narragansett, Galilee, and Pt. Judith might have a stake in this program, professors from URI, RI DEM, captains and crews of fishing vessels, restaurant owners, market owners, and seafood lovers. But, secondary audiences might include professors at UConn who are interested in developing a program that is modeled after this initiative.
Audiences who would be interested in GEIF would be people who are environmentally conscious and whom really been active participants for a while. This also can be for people who want to learn more about ways into helping the environment and getting started to make changes with the community.
Save the bay
Save The Bay protects, restores and improves the ecological health of the Narragansett Bay region, including its watershed and adjacent coastal waters, through an ecosystem-based approach to environmental action; defends the right of the public to use and enjoy the Bay and its surrounding waters; and fosters an ethic of environmental stewardship among people who live in or visit the Narragansett Bay region.
As we plan our future, Save The Bay recognizes three imperatives shaping the course of effective environmental action in southern New England:
- Climate change exposes our region to potential threats from rising sea levels and warming waters. As the “Ocean State,” Rhode Island is uniquely vulnerable to the environmental con- sequences of a warming planet.
- Scientists and policymakers increasingly recognize the interconnections between oceans, estuaries, rivers and streams. Effective environmental management must respect these complex interactions and reflect a regional, ecosystem-based approach to environmental action.
Individuals, acting in concert for the common good, can have a profound impact on improving the natural world. Creating and reinforcing an ethic of individual responsibility and stewardship are essential to effecting positive change. How people are making a difference: Overwhelmingly, we have found, people want a cleaner, healthier Narragansett Bay. But many are unsure of how they can make a difference. Who Saves The Bay? Celebrates a multitude of activism by paying tribute to individuals who put their time, talent or resources to Bay-saving use, both big and small. These people bring the best of themselves to Save The Bay
I really liked the way this online website presented itself than all the rest. This website used only three different fonts at most and had only some images .The colors were also very simple.
What social networks do the organizations use? Online websites
- Do they prefer one social network to another? What makes you think that? Explain. Use evidence. No, because Save the Bay is the most popular one in Rhode Island, and no other organization that I know of in this state is really trying to compete with this one.
- If two or more of the organizations/individuals both use Facebook or Twitter, compare how the way they use the tools in similar or unique ways. For instance, how consistently do they most status updates, what types of images do they use for profile pictures, what types of writing is found on the different social media platforms, how robust or developed is their presence. Describe how you see these folk using these tools, in other words. By keeping up to date with publicizing their campaign they use numerous amounts of social media content, and when I say numerous I mean over 10! The two most common ones they use are facebook and twitter. I looked at both of their sites and they do use that as a tool to get more people aware for this cause.
- What is the aims/purposes that the organizations are using specific posts for? Try to account for the different ways that aims fit into larger scale goals and desires. For instance, if I’m an environmental group at URI I might hope to end global warming at a large scope. At a more mid-level scope, my goal might be to increase awareness about the importance of members of the URI community recycling responsibly. But I might retweet a post about an event the SEC is holding where they will show a documentary. My aim, in this case, is most simply to get members of the URI community to attend the showing of this documentary, or to make community members aware that such an event exists.
Save the bay has so much to offer, whether it is restoring salt marshes, dams, brown fields or doing volunteer work or even having an internship, Save the bay really does have a lot to give to the community.
- Who are the audiences the groups/individuals target? Think about this the same way you thought about aims. Thing about audiences generally, and try to move to a more specific and narrow description of the people who might care. If I am analyzing the URI Sustainable Seafood Initiative, for instance, I might think that citizens from Narragansett, Galilee, and Pt. Judith might have a stake in this program, professors from URI, RI DEM, captains and crews of fishing vessels, restaurant owners, market owners, and seafood lovers. But, secondary audiences might include professors at UConn who are interested in developing a program that is modeled after this initiative.
- This again is for people who care about the environment and want Narragansett to be a clean and safe place.
URI sustainable seafood initiative
The URI Sustainable Seafood Initiative web site is intended to
- Provide independent information on the issue of sustainable seafood, the various approaches being used to promote demand for sustainable seafood, and the efficacy of those approaches. The target audiences are the seafood industry, retailers, restaurateurs, the catch sector and aquaculture producers, policy-makers, environmentalists, and academics.
The purpose of this website is not to find consensus around the term sustainability, but rather to provide independent clarity on the means by which various groups are using market-based approaches to promote sustainable seafood, however that group defines it. Some groups use seafood guides, categorizing seafood into green, yellow and red lists, where at times there is consensus among the lists and at times there is not. Another approach is ecolabeling, or certification, programs. Yet other groups have proprietary programs available for seafood buyers. As most in the seafood world know, this can be a very confusing issue because often the various approaches appear to be at odds with each other in their final recommendations on sustainable seafood.
The purpose of this website is to provide:
- A source of information on where you may further your knowledge
- Third-party independent analysis of mechanisms of the sustainable seafood movement, and
- Analysis of the market impacts of the sustainable seafood movement Based on peer-reviewed research from around the world
A key feature of this website is the Resources Database, which is a searchable database of peer-reviewed journal articles, government publications, reports by environmental organizations, and other pertinent reports addressing fisheries and aquaculture certification, consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood, international trade implications, and other related issues. Its purpose is to provide you with access to as wide a perspective of reputable research on these issues as possible. Many of the reports can be downloaded directly from the database.
This online website wasn’t my favorite but it was very clear and it did have a stance. The only thing I did not like was how wordy it was. I started losing interest but yet again I’m not really into the whole seafood industry so I’m sure my say doesn’t even matter.
What social networks do the organizations use? Online website associated with URI groups/club
- Do they prefer one social network to another? What makes you think that? Explain. Use evidence. Not necessarily this website gives more detail on exactly what this program is about and the entire major key terms associated with the seafood industry.
- If two or more of the organizations/individuals both use Facebook or Twitter, compare how the way they use the tools in similar or unique ways. For instance, how consistently do they most status updates, what types of images do they use for profile pictures, what types of writing is found on the different social media platforms, how robust or developed is their presence. Describe how you see these folk using these tools, in other words.
- The advertising isn’t well used. On every page you go to, the only thing that says in very small print is either tell a friend or suggestions. It’s very easy to miss that’s why you have to look closely. The definitely should use other social media to enhance their advertisement.
- What is the aims/purposes that the organizations are using specific posts for? Try to account for the different ways that aims fit into larger scale goals and desires. For instance, if I’m an environmental group at URI I might hope to end global warming at a large scope. At a more mid-level scope, my goal might be to increase awareness about the importance of members of the URI community recycling responsibly. But I might retweet a post about an event the SEC is holding where they will show a documentary. My aim, in this case, is most simply to get members of the URI community to attend the showing of this documentary, or to make community members aware that such an event exists.
It was really hard finding where to join this group and how to get started. When you reach “home” all it says is to attend this invitational event. They do give the names of all the members involved so I’m sure that’s one way of contacting them to see if you are interested other than that it was very vague.
- Who are the audiences the groups/individuals target? Think about this the same way you thought about aims. Thing about audiences generally, and try to move to a more specific and narrow description of the people who might care. If I am analyzing the URI Sustainable Seafood Initiative, for instance, I might think that citizens from Narragansett, Galilee, and Pt. Judith might have a stake in this program, professors from URI, RI DEM, captains and crews of fishing vessels, restaurant owners, market owners, and seafood lovers. But, secondary audiences might include professors at UConn who are interested in developing a program that is modeled after this initiative.
This group is for people really devoted to all the aspects of the seafood industry.